访谈|金光集团APP(中国)副总裁:进博会一直是外企侨商融入中国市场的大好机会******
(第五届进博会)访谈|金光集团APP(中国)副总裁:进博会一直是外企侨商融入中国市场的大好机会
中新网上海11月5日电 题:访谈|金光集团APP(中国)副总裁:进博会一直是外企侨商融入中国市场的大好机会
作者 高志苗
从艺术纸花打造的生态花园,到造型独特的纸质婚纱成为“打卡点”,再到把“展台”搬到线上带来沉浸式、数字化的观展体验……自从2018年第一届中国国际进口博览会举办以来,金光集团APP作为进博会坚定的伙伴,五年来一直如期奔赴“进博之约”。
“进博会一直是我们这些外企侨商融入中国市场的大好机会,双循环和进博会的双重助力为我们带来了更多发展机遇。历届进博会在打通内外贸、促进双循环等方面取得了实打实的成果,进博‘溢出效应’也更加显著,连续参展进博会也让我们每年都有新的收获。”金光集团APP(中国)副总裁翟京丽接受中新网记者专访时表示。
金光集团APP(中国)旗下广西金桂工厂 金光集团APP供图在往届进博会中,无论是产品推广还是企业合作,金光集团APP都取得了出色成绩。包括王牌产品Foopak可生物降解系列等在内的低碳绿色产品,受到广泛关注,累计意向合作订单近5亿美金。
“对企业而言进博会的辐射效应是无边的,可以倒逼企业快速发展成长。作为进博会的老朋友,每次参加进博会我们都感觉责任重大,而这样的压力也转化成我们的动力,促使我们不断地升级。所以我们也把进博会当作我们的奥运会,每一年都要展示不一样的风采。”翟京丽说。
金光集团APP(中国)旗下山东博汇纸业 金光集团APP供图在本届进博会上,金光集团APP带来了全球首发产品创新纤维素生物基材“BBC纤维絮纸”,这种新型生物可降解材料提取于天然材料,使用过后可以通过回收并予微生物分解,作为腐殖质培育苗圃再次造林,与可降解塑料复合使用后,不仅能提升材料强度和耐热性,同时可形成良好的塑料分解生态循环。
作为全球造纸行业的领军企业,经过30年的发展,印尼华侨企业金光集团APP在中国已经拥有30多家全资或控股浆纸企业,17家林业公司,是全球领先的浆纸业集团公司之一。2021年,金光集团APP(中国)在华总资产达2465亿元(人民币,下同),销售额约973亿元。
金光集团APP持续加码本土投入投资。2022年上半年,金光集团APP(中国)旗下金桂浆纸二期第二台纸机和年产75万吨化机浆扩建项目同时开工,总投资达118亿元。不久前,旗下山东博汇纸业45万吨高档信息纸项目—PM8纸机生产线上卷出纸,打破了同行业纸机开机纪录。
翟京丽介绍,面对未来发展,企业提出了两个转型,即数智转型和绿色转型。“中国的数智化转型走在世界前列,我们现在也在跨界学习进行各种重构,从生产端到终端打通整个链条,我们的在中国数智化转型成功经验,也可以复制到印尼。”
绿色转型方面,翟京丽表示金光集团APP坚持“碳汇做加法,碳排做减法”。“例如,我们考虑通过搭建平台和不同企业合作,充分利用各类木材边角料或者秸秆等‘废物’资源,增加生物质能源的比例。今年进博会展台我们也将继续以绿色、可持续为核心,展现无限循环的绿色基因理念,也将正式启动APP(中国)ESG三年路径图规划、发布集团首份ESG报告,向合作伙伴和行业同仁展现‘绿色信心’。”
“中国市场强大的韧性以及持续扩大对外开放的愿景,让我们这些侨企感受到了稳定的营商环境和实实在在的安全感。未来,中国依旧会是我们全球投资的首选国。”翟京丽说。(完)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。 资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。 因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。 日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。 Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
|